War on Terror Facts Essay Example for Free

War on Terror Facts EssayTerrorists, by definition, fight an entirely polar type of contend. Acts of terrorism are not perpetrated by soldiers, they are carried out by individuals, or groups of individuals, who bring in no other recourse but to lash out at the nations that they perceive as their oppressors with some(prenominal) tools they nurture available. They strap bombs on their backs, walk into areas crowded with people, and strike a blow for the cause. Car bombs, snipers, hijacked airplanes, it makes no difference how the terrorist act is accomplished, as long as it has the desired effect. There are no rules of warfare, no governments to be held accountable, and no moral standards to be upheld. Now we find ourselves, as the Statesns, waging war against an army of individuals that nourish no common country, government, or ethical measure to which they can be held accountable. Their numbers increase exponentially as we drop smart bombs, and roll tanks over the very peop le that the terrorists fight to liberate from oppression, pass on fueling the fire of hatred that burns for us and what we stand for.Whether the U. S. s seen as a liberator, handout the people from oppressive Fundamentalists, or the Fundamentalists are seen as Freedom Fighters liberating the people from an occupying force, the reason for the conflict is irrelevant. This article is meant however to bring about discussion as to how to end it. The fact is that we are currently combat a war under terms in which we cannot possibly win, our enemies know it, and they are emboldened by it. Since the beginning of Americas War on Global Terrorism, the number of terrorists in has increased, as have the bombings and casualties, and not just in Iraq.The increase of terrorist activities has increased worldwide, and despite what our leaders tell us, there is no end in sight. If we tarry on this course, we will lose this fight. You can win a war against an opposing country or government, but you cant win a war against an adversary that has no boundaries, no limits, no leader to concede defeat, or an enemy army that gains 10 newfound recruits for every casualty inflicted. At least not by using conventional methods and abiding by any type of moral code or rules of warfare. The importance of this cliched expression cannot be underestimated.Victories on the battlefield or in the interrogation rooms are meaningless if terror networks can continue to recruit from a large wellspring of discontented youth. And that is exactly what is happening. The wave of horror and sympathy for the victims that bedcover across much of the Arab and Moslem world after 11 September has long ago changed to something else. America is seen as having capitalised on those attacks by trying to conquer Muslim countries Afghanistan and Iraq. The war on Saddam was seen by some(prenominal) as an unwarranted attack on a largely defenceless civilian population, already emaciated by 12 years of UN sanc tions.Washingtons military and diplomatic support for Israel still the bete noire for most Arabs is undiminished. Unfairly, many young Arabs blame their unemployment and lack of a political voice on a US-Zionist conspiracy aimed at somehow suppressing Muslims. But there is also now a growing conviction that the Bush brass has acquired a taste for regime change and will not stop at Baghdad. Threats to Syria and Iran to change their policies only confirm that view. Against this backdrop it is hardly surprising that the US and its close ally Britain are losing the battle for Arab and Muslim hearts and minds